User talk:Kelisi

Attention visiteurs de la Wikipédia française!
Si vous voulez me laisser un message, veuillez copier le texte ci-dessous et l’insérer après le message pour que je puisse avoir un lien à votre page de discussion à la Wikipédia française. N’oubliez pas de substituer votre nom utilisateur là où vous voyez les «Φ» dans le texte. Je répondrai à votre message aussitôt que possible. Merci.
[[:fr:Utilisateur:Φ\|Φ de la fr:WP]]–[[:fr:Discussion_Utilisateur:Φ\|Discussion]]−~~~~

Achtung Besucher aus der deutschen Wikipedia!
Wenn Sie mir eine Nachricht lassen wollen, bitte kopieren Sie zunächst folgenden Text und tragen Sie ihn nach Ihrer Nachricht ein, damit ich über einen Link mit Ihrer Diskussionsseite in der deutschen Wikipedia verfügen kann! Vergessen Sie nicht, dass Sie auch die drei „Φ“ durch Ihren Benutzernamen ersetzen müssen! Ich beantworte Ihre Nachricht so schnell wie möglich. Vielen Dank!
[[:de:Benutzer:Φ\|Φ von de:WP]]–[[:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Φ\|Diskussion]]−~~~~

¡Atención visitadores de la Wikipedia española!
Si usted quiere dejarme un mensaje, por favor copie de antemano el texto siguiente e inscríbalo después del mensaje para que yo pueda tener un enlace con su página de discusión en la Wikipedia española. No olvide que tiene que cambiar los «Φ» sustituyendo cada vez su nombre de usuario. Contestaré a su mensaje tan pronto como podré. Gracias.
[[:es:Usuario:Φ\|Φ de la es:WP]]–[[:es:Usuario_Discusión:Φ\|Discusión]]−~~~~

And now, everyone else...

I'm sorry that I can't understand your language, but if you are from another Wikipedia and would like me to respond to a message left here on your Talk page at your "home" Wikipedia, you can modify one of the code lines in the three boxes just above this one. You will, however, not only have to insert your username and language code, but also the text from your Wikipedia used for "User" and "User_talk".

For older discussions, see:

Archive 1 (18 September 2007 to 26 January 2008)
Archive 2 (21 February 2008 to 13 February 2013)

Alexander Wood

Just to fill you in, regarding your talk page comments from a couple of months ago at Talk:Alexander Wood (merchant): per the Dictionary of Canadian Biography entry, I was able to confirm that whoever originally added that statement simply linked to the wrong John Beverley Robinson in error; his father, Sir John Robinson, 1st Baronet, of Toronto, also has the middle name Beverley, was born in 1791 and already had a close professional association with William Dummer Powell even though he wasn't actually a political officeholder yet. Bearcat (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hinzweiler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Wainwright and Thing

Hohenöllen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kingdom

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

François Bigot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cause and effect

Hoppstädten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cellar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jettenbach, Rhineland-Palatinate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oriel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kreimbach-Kaulbach, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Harrow and Lauter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kelisi. You have new messages at Tolly4bolly's talk page.
Message added 15:15, 14 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

T4B (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Langenbach, Kusel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lohnweiler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lauter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hofacker.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Hofacker.gif

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nerzweiler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Niederalben, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wainwright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Oberalben (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Watershed

Oberstaufenbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wainwright

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So there I was, minding my own business

when my watchlist told me you were editing Nancy Wilson. "Groan" I thought. Imagine my surprise when I discovered that someone who knew and understood English grammar was doing it! You're making a grumpy old man very happy. Thank you. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Hofacker.gif

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Hofacker.gif

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. czar · · 07:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paris may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Offenbach-Hundheim may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Quirnbach, Kusel may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oberweiler im Tal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wainwright and Thing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lauter Valley Railway and Landstuhl–Kusel railway

Yes, but I hadn't set a priority on them. I suppose, I could do them earlier, if you intend to link them in your articles, which are very impressive.--Grahame (talk) 02:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Odenbach, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keystone and Becherbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pfeffelbach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wainwright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rammelsbach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Reichweiler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Regular_events|Henschtal]] for more). Whitsun is called ''Pﬁngsten'' in [[German language|German]]), partly explaining the custom’s name; the ''—quack'' part of the name refers to a rhyme that the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rothselberg may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

founding, Rothselberg lay within the free [[Holy Roman Empire|Imperial]] Domain (''Reichsland'' ]) around [[Kaiserslautern]]. Thus, every village in the domain, one after another, was pledged to

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Köppen or Koppen

Hi Kelisi. Regarding your edits ([1] - [2] - [3]), commenting, "no excuse". In English alphabet, I don't have to use diacritics not used in the alphabet, in fact, sometimes I feel that when I write here Köppen dotted, it may seem substandard, unless I'm explaining the origin of the name, not in articles which redirect to the main article, or writing in a language which uses the dotted ö. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 10:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kleingladenbach.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kleingladenbach.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:32, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oberdieten.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oberdieten.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:20, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kusel (district), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lauter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BRD

For future reference, please see Wp:BRD if one of your bold edits is reverted. Don't just re-revert: go to the talk page. - SchroCat (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since you so jealously guard all the James Bond articles as if you own them, it hardly seems worth the trouble to argue over one word when I know from previous experience that you are completely unreasonable, have no respect for our language and will oppose any effort to improve the English in any one of your precious articles. Scrutinize others' deeds, yet offer understanding. I think that's what I'd say.Kelisi (talk) 18:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That old chestnut – "WP:OWN". As an outsider looking in, SchroCat could easily teach you a thing or two about the English language. Instead of carping about it, indulge in the advice given. -- Cassianto ^Talk 06:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As an outsider looking in who has awarded Gavin a barnstar, I think you mean. Outsider, indeed. I'm an English teacher, and holder of a degree in language, including linguistics, grammar, phonetics and phonology and semantics in three languages. Not many people here could easily teach me a thing or two about the English language. As for being a "chestnut" ("an old or stale joke" -- Collins; "a subject, idea, or joke that has been discussed or repeated so often that it is not funny any more" -- Cambridge), it's no joke, and never has been. Nobody owns any article.Kelisi (talk) 14:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please get over yourself. -- Cassianto ^Talk 14:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gavin has posted his name on his userpage. Your award is in the history logs. I don't know which of those you meant, but I rather think your issue has more to do with you being caught in a bit of hypocrisy. Take your own advice, please.Kelisi (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bad Kreuznach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porphyry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bad Sobernheim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Einollen

Many thanks for your extensive notes on Einollen. I have tracked down my ancestors to this area. They came to Australia in the 1850's and I hope to visit Einollen in the next few weeks looking for traces of them (Werner and Schuster). I was a bit depressed to see that the only famous person from the area was a Nazi rascist called Hermann Gauch! Is that the best the area can offer? Camerojo (talk) 07:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Not sure if this is where I should post my reply). My ancestor, Jacob Werner, was indeed a musician. He was in the Bavarian army but deserted, eventually making his way to Liverpool where he signed on as musician on a ship to Australia in 1855. He was born in Oberweiler-Tiefenbach (and it seems I have you to thank for that page as well!) in 1829. He and other members of his family were christened in the church of Einollen. I was hoping to find some birth/christening and other records in Einollen and Oberweiler-Tiefenbach - perhaps also some gravestones or cemetery records. Also I am interested in tracking down any remote cousins - descendants of those Werners who may have stayed in the region.

You name the mayors of the villages. I was thinking of trying to contact them before we go by means of an email in German, but not sure how best to reach them. Do you think that is a good idea? I presume you also have some connection with the area - is that the case?

By the way, my wife, who will be traveling with me, is an archaeologist and very interested in the Roman connections you mention in Trier. Thank you for that recommendation. Camerojo (talk) 23:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daxweiler, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bench and Niche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dörrebach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Awl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Duchroth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Keystone and Overlord

Eckenroth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hoe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lesene

Sorry, I missed the reference because I skimmed the list and it wasn't bolded - I'll be more careful next time. But please cut your fellow editors some slack; your comment was unnecessary, unkind and unCIVil. Bermicourt (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gebroth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sewer

Gutenberg, Germany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Enamel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hackenheim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Switzerland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I left a reply to your question

Hi CJ; Sorry about the long delay but I just left a reply to your question on my talk page. I have a hard enough time with English so I appreciate your varied language skills!! Jim Derby (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kellenbach may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of inheritance, sale and enfeoffments, so that the Kellenbach High Court was a ''Ganerbschaft'' (a joint holding, or a kind of [[condominium (international law)|condominium]], with joint high

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kirn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Tyrol, Cellar, Niche and Noé

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Langenlonsheim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Menorah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Löllbach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyrol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Herem

I have restored all the tags you removed from Herem (priestly gift). You should not remove legitimate tags without solving the issues they were added for first. Debresser (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits were reversed. Per WP:BRD you should first discuss and establish consensus before you edit again. If you continue to edit war over this, I will simply have you blocked. Debresser (talk) 17:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you could have replied here. I usually watch the talkpages of people I post to. Debresser (talk) 17:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Münchwald, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Escutcheon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Kleistschmenzin1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kleistschmenzin1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:EvKleistSchmenzin.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EvKleistSchmenzin.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Plötzenseedeathroom.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Plötzenseedeathroom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Hofacker.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Hofacker.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:EvaMariaBuchcirca1940.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EvaMariaBuchcirca1940.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:HansCoppi.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HansCoppi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:HildeCoppi.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HildeCoppi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:HarroandLibertasSchulzeBoysen.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HarroandLibertasSchulzeBoysen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:KandESchuhmacher.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KandESchuhmacher.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Friedrich Olbricht.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Friedrich Olbricht.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:GeorgThomas.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GeorgThomas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:HansvDohnanyi.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HansvDohnanyi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:OberstFritzJaeger.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OberstFritzJaeger.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Karl Ernst Rahtgens.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Karl Ernst Rahtgens.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Egbert Hayessen.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Egbert Hayessen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Neu-Bamberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Porphyry

Norheim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Porphyry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Otzweiler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Apartfromtheflock.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pfaffen-Schwabenheim may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Starkenburg. When that line then died out only 23 years later in 1437, their [[Condominium (international law|joint]] successors were [[Electoral Palatinate]], the [[Margraviate of Baden]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grosse Lage vs Großlage

Dear Kelisi, thank you for your support. Now I have a better understanding why wine selling in English speaking countries may be so difficult. Ergo bibamus.--Symposiarch (talk) 16:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

virtual glass of wine

	Wine
	I share a virtual glass of wine with you Symposiarch (talk) 16:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Schmittweiler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bingen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:13colbox.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:13colbox.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:LohraWappen.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:LohraWappen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Niederdieten.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Niederdieten.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:UlrichsteinWappen.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:UlrichsteinWappen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Calabogie

Hi. I've deleted your addition of unsourced WP:OR at the article for Best Damn Fiddler.... I'm not familiar with the film, really, but there is a comment on the film page from one user that the film was partly shot near "Calabogie." That aside, it seems like a fairly trivial point, anyway, as it's merely the title for a fictional work, not a documentary about either community. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chaumet may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Pierre, were appointed executive directors of the House. They took over the Breguet (watch)|Breguet]] brand in 1970. François Bodet, a Maison Chaumet executive, renewed the brand and positioned

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chaumet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yves Saint Laurent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Will Millar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pasadena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:13colbox.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:13colbox.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amin al-Majaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reused image File:BakerStreetOriginalPlatforms1863.jpg

Hi, re your photo File:BakerStreetOriginalPlatforms1863.jpg, have you noticed that it was used at this recent news story without crediting you? You might want to look at c:COM:ENFORCE. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 06:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autism as a mental disorder

I don't consider autism to be a disorder of any kind, being a person who is autistic. However, the DSM considers autism to be one. To be specific, they merged classical, Asperger's and PDD-NOS into one. I received a diagnosis of ASD and ADHD under the DSM-5. Besides, even if the DSM didn't consider it be a mental disorder, most people do and that is why neurodiversity activists are fighting against.

http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/Autism%20Spectrum%20Disorder%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf Andrea Carter (at your service | my evil deads) 05:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bearing Strait crossing

Good job on the copyedit on Bering Strait crossing. That page has been on my mental "to-do" list for some time, but was pretty low on my priority list; I was glad to see your improvements to it when they popped up on my watch list. I did notice that you don't seem to care for the word via and changed it twice. I guess it doesn't really matter, both via and through can be used as prepositions to mean "by means of". Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 05:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bananas used for cooking is not called plantains.. Green bananas are used for cooking in most of our Caribbean Islands.. Plantains are a type of bananas it's bigger and longer than bananas that are ripe.. We fry plantains preferably when it's ripened b...

Bananas used for cooking is not called plantains.. Green bananas are used for cooking in most of our Caribbean Islands.. Plantains are a type of bananas it's bigger and longer than regular bananas that are ripened..We fry plantains preferably when it's ripened but it's also fried when it's green and mashed.. Paula Lale (talk) 23:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pförtchen.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pförtchen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject 19th-century American Music invitation

Most courteous Greetings to you, Kelisi! Your participation is ardently sought in helping to establish one of Wikipedia's newest projects - 19-century American Music a collaborative venture to improve the coverage of '19th-century American Music' the English Wikipedia. A treasure trove of adventure awaits you as we improve and expand upon the wealth, heritage, history and impact of this music genre. What is a project without participants like you? If your interest is piqued please leave your calling card and add your name to our proposed Project page. You will be kept informed of the development of this new project in the coming weeks. To leave your valuable opinions and suggestions, please contact me. With All Cordiality and The Very Best of Regards, Barbara (WVS) (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Collingwood, Queensland page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Collingwood, Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waterhole. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gundagai diacritic

While you have fixed a diacritic, that didn't really need fixing, as it is covered by the disam page already in place, so while your talk page is littered with examples of not using disam pages, you have correctly fixed one, even though the Wp page on disam says to not only just fix one if that's all you're doing. They matter, but not enough when the link goes to wher it is supposed to go to anyway. Dave Rave (talk) 06:58, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what the point of your message is, but my insertion of an umlaut was one of several edits I did yesterday at various articles as part of a housekeeping sweep that I do every now and then to deal with lazy users who couldn't be bothered to put the umlaut in the name Köppen; "Koppen" is simply wrong. His name was Köppen; he pronounced it like that. I'll just repeat the message that I commonly put in the summary slot when I do this: Diacritics matter. And they do, too. By the way, I see that your own Talk page is "littered" with one general kind of message; so no stone throwing in vitreous structures, eh? Kelisi (talk) 16:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Small world?

I was checking through my watchlist and saw your edit on Georgina River and was surprised to see the citation coming from my Renamed Places in Queensland webpage. I'm glad someone finds it useful (it's a never-ending task, it seems our ancestors couldn't resist renaming/misnaming/duplicating everything they could). If you ever don't find what you are looking for on that webpage, send me an email (it's on the page or talk to me on-wiki) and I will see if I can help. And thank you for your work on improving Queensland articles! Kerry (talk) 06:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is turning up for me on Chollarton (or variant spellings) in my various databases. I think the document we want to see is this map. Alas it is about 1700km south of me! But I shall make some enquiries. Kerry (talk) 15:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using our "Ask a Librarian" service (reference inquiries), I have requested that the State Library of Victoria (who hold a copy of the map mentioned above) check it for any indication of the location of Chollarton. Fingers crossed that they are willing to do it and that Chollarton is marked on it. It can take a couple of weeks for these enquiries, so we have to be patient. 03:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

No joy. SLV were very kind and scanned the map for me but it turns out it is the same map as already appears in the article. So Chollarton remains a mystery. Kerry (talk) 02:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Collingwood, Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winton and WP:INTDAB

Regarding your 2 partial reverts of edits by User:Niceguyedc and me at Winton, Queensland concerning how to link to Winton or Winton (disambiguation): did you read WP:INTDAB? If yes, why do you think it should be ignored in this case? I don't intend to pursue compliance with this guideline in that article, but you should expect that bots and other editors will. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Silly names

Hello, there is a small municipality in south Germany called Rattenharz. Kind regards--Buchbibliothek (talk) 07:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you.

compass directions NbW etc

I just noticed your recent edit to Collingwood, Queensland and was surprised to see NbW etc as directions. After some searching I found its meaning. I'm not sure how many people use this form in Australian English (I did a bit of a search and could not find any examples of it, but then I can't find Australian documents that use 32 compass points for any purpose). I guess I am concerned that the article will be less accessible to readers if the notation is unfamiliar. Kerry (talk) 05:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not disputing that it's the right name, but as a piece of terminology that nobody seems to use (e.g. most references to NbW on Wikipedia aare to Nebelwerfer weapon model numbers), I'm just not sure what use it is to the readers. Maybe if you linked any of these "by" directions to Points of the compass#32-wind compass points, it would at least help the reader figure it out. But looking at the table, I honestly think you could just approximate them to the better known 16 compass points, e.g. Albrighton appears to be NNW to my eye. Kerry (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you mention that the Bing maps shows the streets in Collingwood. It doesn't show all of them. If you want to see the streets and the individual land parcels that were surveyed for the town (which all still exist as it seems nobody's bothered to aggregate them), you need to download the Queensland Globe (which is just a tiny XML file) and open it from within Google Earth. Then turn on the Land Parcel Boundaries in the Layers menu (left-side bar) on Google Earth. Details are here. It's *the* tool for anyone working with Qld geography; I have it running all the time when I am working on Wikipedia. The only problem is that while the Qld Globe layers are CC-BY, the underlying imagery is copyright, so you can't take screenshots for use on Wikipedia (which is a great pity). Kerry (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kelisi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

v:Calculus I

Please help my translation in:

https://fr.wikiversity.org/wiki/Calcul_infinit%C3%A9simal

My French is only fr-1. I used Google Translate and someone at French Wikipedia said that the translation is not good. Please tell others about the English page, such as high school and college math students and faculty. Thanks in advance.--2602:304:CDC1:90:64C5:4976:D62C:FF33 (talk) 12:05, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Rhodes

Done Giant Snowman 20:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:CITY OF BALLAARAT at Southern Cross Stn.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CITY OF BALLAARAT at Southern Cross Stn.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:KelisiattheTaj2010.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KelisiattheTaj2010.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo permission request

Hello

The Canadian Museum of History is preparing a permanent gallery titled: Canadian History Hall. The exhibition will open, July 1st, 2017.

The Museum has identified the following work(s) in your collection which we are seeking authorization to reproduce in the context of the project:

Metricated Speed Limit Sign Bolton,ON https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MetricatedSpeedLimitSignBoltonON2011.jpg

The Museum would like to obtain your permission to reproduce the work(s) mentioned above for the following purposes; in an interactive timeline on computer station(s) in the exhibition and on its Website.

If there is any cost associated with acquiring the high resolution digital file(s) (8 x 10 at 300 dpi) and/or any cost to use the work(s) in the context of the project, please provide us the total fees and, if possible, the detail rate per use.

Thank you

M. / Mr. Dominique Dufour Agent aux actifs numériques, Salle de l’histoire canadienne Musée canadien de l’histoire Digital Assets Officer, Canadian History Hall Canadian Museum of History 100, rue Laurier Street, Gatineau QC K1A 0M8 T 819-776-8529

Permission CMH de la fr:WP–Discussion−Permission CMH (talk) 16:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That file is published under a Creative Commons licence, which means that anybody may use it for any purpose, without charge. So you already have my permission. In case you were wondering, the sign was here:

43.886479, -79.746178

It has been replaced since I took the picture. The current pictures on Google StreetView, however, still show it there. Thank you very much for considering my picture. Kelisi (talk) 18:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Pointless" tagging

I find it amusing that you claim that adding a maintenance tag was "pointless" while at the same time, because of said tag, you made a change which improved the article. Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 02:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coburg-1915.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coburg-1915.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well car and Jacobs bogie

Closeup of a regular truck with specially adapted side bearings, not at all a Jacobs bogie, between two sections of an articulated well car

What you actually saw is a regular North American with specially adapted side bearings and special car end brackets. Peter Horn User talk 17:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mea culpa. Kelisi (talk)

No hay broblema. Btw, brackets → brackets for lack of a better term. I would prefer structural bracket Peter Horn User talk 18:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not all shared bogies are Jacobs bogies, see Talk:Jacobs bogie#Jacobs bogies and shared bogies for articulation. All said, your file shows an alternative to the articulated connector that I was unaware off. Peter Horn User talk 18:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 18:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelisi: On second thought I think that the articulated connector is hidden behind the two closest brackts, Peter Horn User talk 19:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bateaux.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bateaux.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fürfeld

Vielen Dank für den wunderschönen Artikel über Fürfeld. Da ich Familienforschung zur Familie Kahn betreibe, hat mich das sehr interessiert.felbick von de:WP–Diskussion−Felbick (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kelisi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The pronunciation of Benoît-Constant Coquelin

Hello. Are you sure the transcriptions of Benoît-Constant Coquelin are correct? Coquelin in Forvo is pronounced [kɔkylɛ̃]. LoveVanPersie (talk) 16:45, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Barberêchemunicipalitymap.png

The file File:Barberêchemunicipalitymap.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendation for German-English translations

Dear Kelisi,

I'm astonished by the work you have done in regards to German municipalities.

One thing to note: For translations from German to English and vice versa I'd strongly recommend using dict.cc over leo as only they do know the correct English translation for Rindfleischetikettierungsüberwachungsaufgabenübertragungsgesetz.

Best regards from Germany — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4C80:40:40A:BACA:3AFF:FE76:2120 (talk) 07:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Bruce McArthur

Thank-you very much for your recent edits to Bruce McArthur! I have comments on a few of your choices. BTW, I'd wanted to avoid being overly formal with the language and was trying to stick with plain English for the average reader.

strangling → throttling. I feel that strangling might be an easier word for most readers.
because her data were academic Here I felt data is used as a mass noun and unquantifiable (like water), and that treating it as a singular works better.
told him that that was no place to be gay I'll think about a rephrase to avoid that that.
who → whom. There is a movement in plain English to do away with whom. I don't particularly care for that, but it apparently confuses some readers.
I don't think there's any reason to replace html entities (eg: –) with unicode characters.
excavating at 3 properties → three. Normally small numbers are expressed as words instead of numerals. One of the exceptions to this is when numbers may be compared, in which case numbers should all be in the same format (words or numerals). That paragraph has other numbers (30, 75, 100) which the 3 could be compared to. So I feel it's better to have it as a numeral.
most prolific known serial killer. You removed a hyphen in most-prolific. This is a compound modifier and MOS recommends hyphenating these for clarity. I feel the hyphenated version is less demanding on the reader. Serial killer might also be hyphenated but I think most readers are familiar with that term. It may be more obvious with male sex worker which is ambiguous without the hyphen. (Is it a male prostitute, or a "worker" who is of the "male sex"?)
amyl nitrate -Should this read "nitrite"?- One source says to possess amyl nitrates or "poppers," another took poppers, amyl nitrate, though I see the Wikipedia article says it belongs to a class called "alkyl nitrites" which I take to be an over-encompassing chemical group.
cafe → café I would rather not use accents on loanwords. I don't believe there is any confusion to what a cafe (unaccented) is.
f-- fa-ots → fucking fagots. The Bowdlerism is part of a published quote and I feel that it should be reproduced as published.

Also thanks for a lot of the useful linking you added! – Reidgreg (talk) 16:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback 2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides

Hello, Kelisi. You have new messages at Talk:2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides#>Extraneous hyphens.
Message added 21:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reidgreg (talk) 21:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback notice on 2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides#Removal of hyphens

Hello, Kelisi. You have new messages at Talk:2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides#Removal of hyphens.
Message added 18:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reidgreg (talk) 18:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:HansvDohnanyi.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HansvDohnanyi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mont Nicol-Albert.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mont Nicol-Albert.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kelisi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Doubleday

Hi Kelisi, Well done! I also find PC on WP intensely irritating. I recently had a go at this one (under a different IP): Talk:List of crewed Mars mission plans, but it didn't go down too well! Best wishes and a Happy New Year! 31.52.160.160 (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on drug name

I believe that you brought this up a few months ago and I thought you might be interested in commenting now. Talk:2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides § RfC on drug name on how to state the name of a drug mentioned in court documents about a living person. – Reidgreg (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Bogart House

The area is up for redevelopment, the house itself is a protected heritage structure. Likely move it elsewhere. I'll see what I can find in the local papers and let you know Oaktree b (talk) 12:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see you're from Bolton. Almost a local :) https://www.newmarket.ca/TownGovernment/Documents/46%20-%202018-43%20Bogart%20House.pdf Oaktree b (talk) 12:54, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Karte Limburg in Deutschland.png

The file File:Karte Limburg in Deutschland.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Pretzsch.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Frankenberg-Steinhaus.jpg

The file File:Frankenberg-Steinhaus.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WEuropeafterWWI.png

The file File:WEuropeafterWWI.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Frankenberg-Kloster.jpg

The file File:Frankenberg-Kloster.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Frankenberg-Rathaus2.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Nyook. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wisconsin Central Ltd. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Nyook ^✉ 05:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Altogether

Although I agree that "altogether" has a different meaning from "all together", in most of the instances of the change you have been making, I think "altogether" was the intended meaning, and the changes you have made were unhelpful. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Altogether, 35 civilians were killed and only the château was left standing." — I would say that contention is a little incomprehensible. It is being used there to indicate a sum ("35 civilians"), and I hardly believe that it means that they were killed outright instead of being gravely wounded.

No, I am pretty sure the "all told" meaning was intended here, not the "utterly" meaning. Kelisi (talk) 17:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"It is uncommon in western Africa where it usually occurs in small groups, but more plentiful, with large colonies, in eastern Africa. It is also common in southern Asia, but altogether its numbers seem to be declining." I don't think we agree on this one. Perhaps it is a British / American usage problem. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Altogether vs All together

I have noticed that you are continuing to vandalize Wikipedia, incorrectly changing "altogether" where used correctly by previous authors to "all together" in dozens of articles. Those words do not mean what you think they mean! Briefly, "Altogether" means:

Completely
All things considered
In sum
Collectively
On the whole
Once all is said and done

While "all together" refers to:

People all together in one place at one time
Things all together in one place at one time
Referring to or addressing a group as one

I appreciate your enthusiasm in mass-correcting articles on Wikipedia, but before pursuing such an endeavor, please ensure that you correctly understand what you are doing. I suggest that you go back and fix the articles where you incorrectly changed the wording in this way. If this problem continues, I will be escalating it for administrative review. Here are a couple resources for you to review to help confirm what I am conveying:

Just checking to make sure I'm not crazy, I put paragraphs for several of your updated articles into Grammarly (a well known digital writing and grammar assistant), it flags your use of "all together" as wrong and suggests correcting it to "altogether". Also, I scored 100% on the quiz above. Techie007 (talk) 20:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Michaeljacksonslash.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Michaeljacksonslash.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits over at Geisha

Hi - I'm kind of baffled as to why you've changed "after the war" to "post-war" in every single circumstance over at Geisha with the reasoning "this isn't an office memo" and "cut the cool dude talk"?

For want of a better word (ha!), it seems snipey and to be honest, just kind of pointless. I'd get changing it in some circumstances for variety, but I can't say I've ever seen anyone call "after the war" "cool dude talk" - as in, too informal, too conversational. I'm just saying - I appreciate people helping out with the Japanese arts and culture articles, as sometimes it does feel like just me sweeping them up and rewriting them, but for the future, you don't have to go in so hard on a few grammar issues. We're here to build the article, and not everyone who contributes to the article has the best English, but a bit of WP:GOODFAITH wouldn't go amiss. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 21:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simón Bolívar University (Mexico), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colegio Simón Bolívar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There, that's that sorted out.Kelisi (talk) 06:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary comments about Montanabw

Your edit summary comments here about User:Montanabw, about an edit by a vereran, prolific and well-respected Wikipedia editor, were ill-advised. I will add that madeupinbritain.uk does not appear to me to be a quality reliable source. - Donald Albury 01:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty of vereran, prolific and well-respected Wikipedia editors have been banned. I call them as I see them. Kelisi (talk) 02:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's something to be said for politeness, though. Even if you've got your head in your hands thinking "Oh Christ, what now..." - a bit of assumption of good faith goes a long way to collaborating with your fellow editors, junior or senior. -- Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maize article-- bushels

People outside the US may not know what bushels are, but they are the standard unit used by the industry in the US, which is the biggest in the world, and perhaps outside too, just as dollars are the currency used in the international oil market. I don't know how many Americans know bushels, or how many people anywhere know metric tons, but a "bushel basket" used to be a common size, and maybe still is-- I don't know popular culture well enough. editeur24 (talk) 04:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Colchester; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kelisi reported by User:Elizium23 (Result: ). Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 01:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelisi: I am not an administrator, but you are about to meet a few. Elizium23 (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that figures. You're not worthy of being one. It's clear that you don't know the difference between edit warring and an honest Wikipedian trying to stop a vandal from spoiling an article with ignorant drivel. Kelisi (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobs bogie

@Kelisi: Hello,
Please see my comments at the end of Talk:Jacobs bogie#Jacobs bogies and shared bogies for articulation about that file. Peter Horn User talk 18:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

~~An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alboran Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corsair.~~

~~(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

Seen to.

Ryanair destinations MAP

Hi,

It would be great if bases/destinations on the Ryanair Destinations map would be marked on different colours and if airport code could be added.

Best regards, Michal M007007 (talk) 13:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

William Lyon Mackenzie

My apologies. I lost your useful edit while attempting to revert back to a clean version. Thanks for restoring it. Meters (talk) 05:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I furthermore seem to have annihilated one of yours. I forgot to take into account that as a featured article, there might be heavy editing. Sorry. Kelisi (talk) 05:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, that wasn't you. That was just another one that I had missed the first time around. Meters (talk) 05:57, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Your maps are quite helpful and nicely made! Thank you for contributing!! SusiSansei (talk) 22:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary definition

Merriam-Webster dictionary - Curvaceous - "broadly : having a smoothly curving shape - e.g. a curvaceous coastline" this is additional to being directly linked to human female shape. Urselius (talk) 08:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merriam-Webster's primary definition for that word reads: "having or suggesting the curves of a well-proportioned feminine figure". The "broad" definition is therefore a bit inaccurate — and in an encyclopaedia, we aim for accuracy. Furthermore, Merriam-Webster seems to be about the only dictionary that has the "broad" definition. Kelisi (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:YandexkartyButtonKLS.png

The file File:YandexkartyButtonKLS.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused image intended for user space

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Kehoe edit

I noticed that you reverted my removal of the "partner" value from Jack Kehoe. My reason for removing that value was that Sherry Smith is not mentioned in the text of the article, when an infobox is supposed to "summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article". (MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE) Your reply, "But it IS supported in the references (namely Kehoe's LA Times obituary)" does not change the fact that Smith's being Kehoe's partner is not mentioned in the article's text. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And so what you do is that. I'd call her a very significant other, given that she was with him for 40 years. Kelisi (talk) 04:13, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making that change. The article is better with the relationship documented in the text. Eddie Blick (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Digital Homicide Studios. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Chaheel Riens (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not an "edit war", Chaheel, it is an attempt to remove crappy pretentious pseudo-French rubbish from WP, and there is no reason why anybody should be forbidden to do that. The term "nom de plume" is not used by educated French speakers — and come to that, nor by educated English speakers, who recognize it for the pretentious guff that it is. The French word is le pseudonyme. Je devrais mentionner que mes connaissances de la langue française sont assez avancées ! And my knowledge of English is likewise so. All that the inclusion of "nom de plume" in that article that you own shows is that you do not speak French, and have a very tenuous grip on English usage. The term "nom de plume" was invented in England (that's right, not France or any other French-speaking place) in the 19th century and used by those who wished to appear cultured, and they did, too — to those who knew no better. It is a substandard usage in both English and French, and I treat it as I would any usage of "ain't". Now, please explain why you think that "nom de plume" should be retained in that article? This mystifies me even without regard to its pretentiousness, for the term applies to writers of literature, not software companies. How about it? Kelisi (talk) 20:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responded to the C&P on the relevant talk page. Chaheel Riens (talk) 20:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While it is true that the word was forged in England, saying that the word isn’t used in French is incorrect, the word is present in all reference French dictionaries today (Larousse, Le Robert, TLFi) including the one from the very purist Académie française since 1935: https://dictionnaire-academie.fr/article/A9N0540 Thibaut (talk) 05:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the large number of changes you've made, I suspect a discussion should be here as a resource for all the other editors who may be trying to figure out what is going on. The earliest reference in the Oxford English Dictionary is 1841 and it quotes sources like the Daily Telegraph (a conservative British newspaper) in 1991. Pen name is actually a more recent word dating to 1864 and a back formation. Nom de plume is an English coining. The apparent earlier French language phrase for the same thing is nom de guerre (though as others have pointed out nom de plume seems to be in French now also). Pocket Fowler's has "A nom de plume (also in translated form pen-name) is a name assumed by an author to appear on the title-page of a book; a pseudonym is a name assumed more generally although this too is normally applied in authorial contexts." Nothing about it being substandard. In the case of Louie Crew, nom de plume probably best conveys the spirit in which he was using other names to write. --Erp (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All right, all right! I guess I was wrong about that, but I still maintain that "nom de plume" is needlessly pretentious, getting a bit dated anyway, and much less common than "pen name". I could see that last point in the "What links here" list while I was doing my handiwork.Kelisi (talk) 20:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed this particular sentence: "All that the inclusion of "nom de plume" in that article that you own shows is that you do not speak French, and have a very tenuous grip on English usage" - that's pretty close to not only a personal attack, but also an accusation of article ownership - both of which are frowned upon. Please redact them, thanks. Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:59, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've only just noticed it? I can see that my first impression was right, then: it's pointless to discuss anything with you. You aren't interested in anything that I say. It looks to me as though you're just looking for trouble. Sorry, no nibble.Kelisi (talk) 20:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nevertheless - it's still both insulting and accusatory. You don't have to bite - just redact your statement as a poor choice of words made in the heat of the moment. Chaheel Riens (talk) 21:52, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to redact your accusations? I've asked three times now. I feel quite strongly about unfounded comments such as those, and have given you multiple opportunities to take it back, simply by either editing to remove or striking through. You've been here since at least 2005, so it's strange that you would make such a statement then refuse to acknowledge when challenged. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:17, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous writers' grip on English usage

Continuing from here, some noms de plume or nom de plumes (with my emboldening) for your delectation:

To the most faithful and skilful of these [pupils] the master bestows or bequeaths his name or a part of it, or his nom de plume (GO); and thus it is that the celebrated schools (RYUGI or HA or FU) of Japanese painting have been formed and perpetuated [...]. Henry P. Bowie, On the Laws of Japanese Painting.
The Ballad of Reading Gaol was published early in this same year under the nom de plume 'C.3.3.,' Oscar Wilde's prison number. Stuart Mason, introductory text to Oscar Wilde: A Study.
BEYLE, MARIE HENRI (1783-1842), better known by his nom de plume of Stendhal, French author, was born at Grenoble on the 23rd of January 1783. Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed.
The greatest poet Cuba has produced after Heredia, Gabriel de la Concepcion Valdes, better known by his nom-de-plume of Placido, was born, not at Santiago,—although he passed some years of his life there,—but at Matanzas. Richard Davey, Cuba Past and Present.

It is imaginable that all these writers had no more than a tenuous grip on English usage, but I rather tend to think that it was no less firm than yours or mine. -- Hoary (talk) 00:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know that Richard Davey could be called such a great writer. After all, he has misspelt "Gabriel de la Concepción Valdés" and "Plácido". Famous writers don't always get it right. Read about Pippa Passes and find out how Robert Browning once got it disastrously wrong (it's quite amusing, actually).Kelisi (talk) 07:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Davey was published by Scribner's, for a general readership. Provision of sorts for accented letters was considerably more of a pain for letterpress printing than inserting them is today, so it was common for non-academic books to dispense with such niceties. Yes, famous (or merely proficient) writers do indeed on occasion get it wrong; but when so many use a term that escapes alteration by the proofreaders and copyeditors of their reputable publishers, I'd infer that the term is well-formed within the particular language (here, English). How do you distinguish between what's acceptable and what you call "substandard usage"? -- Hoary (talk) 09:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

If you do not stop your "nom de plume" disruption, you will be blocked. Cullen328 (talk) 17:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're a bit late. I've finished.Kelisi (talk) 20:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AdolfReichwein.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AdolfReichwein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed." — Well, User:Rahammz, the one who removed it and replaced it says that the replacement is a better picture, and I must agree. Go ahead and nix it! Kelisi (talk) 17:12, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frankenberg-Rathaus2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frankenberg-Rathaus2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your File:EastTimor2022OSM.png

Hello Kelisi! Thank you for making the map of East Timor. There are yome things to check on the map. I left some points about at the file discussion. If you are needing help for sources or further informations about East Timor, you can contact me on Commons or on my German user page. Greetings, J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Edit conflict problem there, I'm afraid. Sorry I made you change "sub" for "submersible" twice: I searched for submarine but missed the subs. Moscow Mule (talk) 01:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem — as long as it reads correctly now.Kelisi (talk) 02:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Bain edit

I have reverted your addition of a date of birth to Barbara Bain, along with the accompanying citation to IMDb. That is not a reliable source. Please see WP:IMDB for comments. You might also want to read WP:USERGENERATED to see names of other sites that are similarly not reliable. Eddie Blick (talk) 17:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montreux–Lenk im Simmental line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Euskirchener Kreisbahnen

Hi! I see that you translated Euskirchener Kreisbahnen from the German Wikipedia; thanks for that! It's currently completely unsourced. Are you still working on this article? Actualcpscm (talk) 18:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid it's as sourced as the original German article. I gathered that the sources for all the information are in the "Further reading" section (called "Literatur" in German). Now, I think that those are both paper books, and I wouldn't know how to cite chapter and page, as I have no idea how to get hold of them. They are not likely to be widely available outside Germany, I wouldn't think (I'm not even in Europe). The original writer (much of whose text still seems to stand after 11 years) on de:WP was Radiojunkie. He/She is still active, having made edits less than a week ago. He/She named those two books under "Literatur" even back then. Perhaps somebody will have to ask him/her to be a bit thorougher in his/her attribution. I have also put a message on the new article's Talk page:

"Can somebody find a way to render the two route diagrams here? The German article has them, but I have little idea about how to convert them. Thanks for any help. 17:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC) Kelisi (talk) 17:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC)"[reply]

Can you do that? And if not, can we find somebody who can? Kelisi (talk) 19:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I currently don't have access to these books either, and I don't know that much about German local railway systems. I think the best way forward is to work on this article in draftspace until it's ready for publication; right now, it's just too far from meeting WP:V. Notability is also an issue, particularly because I'm not sure what the reputation of the authors and publishers of the cited books is. Actualcpscm (talk) 13:59, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Montreux Oberland Bernois Railway

The Montreux Oberland Bernois Railway is still the operator of trains over the Montreux–Lenk im Simmental line. Changing all the mentions of one to the other, as you did in various places (e.g. [4]), isn't correct and actually breaks the {{Adjacent stations}} template. Mackensen (talk) 11:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Euskirchener Kreisbahnen moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Euskirchener Kreisbahnen. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it lacks inline citations. Brief discussion at User_talk:SunDawn#Review_of_Euskirchener_Kreisbahnen. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Cave Rock (horse)

On 25 August 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cave Rock (horse), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 02:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Point Given

On 16 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Point Given, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 00:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Fernando Botero

On 18 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Fernando Botero, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

resistance in Germany mapped

Thank you for quality articles about people resisting the Nazis, Helmuth Hübener, Libertas Schulze-Boysen and Willi Graf, written in 2005, for Collingwood, Queensland, for exquisite photos and maps, for making articles of people who died fit for the Main page, - traveller of the world, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2881 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! I am honoured. Kelisi (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Walewska Oliveira

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Walewska Oliveira, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:UploadLinkForCretinsButtonKLS.png

The file File:UploadLinkForCretinsButtonKLS.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned and unencyclopedic image with no foreseeable educational use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 13:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Taj El-Din Hilaly

On 12 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Taj El-Din Hilaly, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Luis Garavito

On 14 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Luis Garavito, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Brian Brain

On 8 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Brian Brain, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 00:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Johnny Ruffo

On 12 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Johnny Ruffo, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 07:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Faustin Twagiramungu

On 4 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Faustin Twagiramungu, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 05:27, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Asqueladd. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Itziar Castro, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Asqueladd (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source is unconsequential. As a user-generated source, no version of Wikipedia is a reliable source. This is explained in WP:RSPRIMARY ("Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose") and WP:USERGENERATED (Content from websites whose content is largely user-generated is generally unacceptable. Sites with user-generated content include personal websites, personal and group blogs (excluding newspaper and magazine blogs), content farms, Internet forums, social media sites, fansites, video and image hosting services, most wikis and other collaboratively created websites". Wikipedia is not perfect, but it should not go backwards. Unsourced or undersourced articles should improve its verifiability with reliable sources. You added content without providing a reliable source and furthermore, you hijacked the citation of a reliable source (WP:HIJACK). All in all, the table (as in originated in es.wikipedia or wherever it came from) should not be handled as a reliable source. At best, you can consider it as a "skeleton" to actually fill with reliable sources. your userpage calls you a "pretentious twat". I've been called many things on here. I've found those two descriptions in particular amusing.--Asqueladd (talk) 22:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I did no such thing as "hijacking" a source. But my view hasn't changed: if you disapprove of that edit, then wipe the whole table out, for it all comes from the table in the Spanish article.

And for Pete's sake, get that obscenity off your userpage! You have no idea how it makes you look. Kelisi (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did hijack citation #21, as that citation is presumed to verify the content to its left and the reliable source does not mention any name for the role Itziar Castro plays in the film. Please read WP:HIJACK. I am certainly persuaded to remove many rows of the table as they seem to be non-notable appearances (and a large chunk of them in non-notable works). I am not inclined to remove them just because they are unsourced. I prefer to look out for reliable sources (for those that seem plausibly sourceable) instead. That's actually something that I've doing in that article.--Asqueladd (talk) 22:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sailakshmi Balijepally

I don't appreciate the tone of your edit summary: "Please work on your comprehension", especially after I took the time to make numerous grammatical and formatting improvements to this article.

1. "it was expected" : Please read MOS:WEASEL

Does not apply. Meaning is perfectly clear. It is also a very common expression when referring to parents' expectations of their children.

2. "Her elder sister was her role model and she was en route" : "she" can refer either to the sister or the article subject—it's not clear.

It is perfectly clear. The subject of the article was never en route to becoming a cardiologist; so it must have been her sister.

Lastly, please read WP:ESDOS

Celjski Grad (talk) 20:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kelisi (talk) 20:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LAME

Your recent editing history at Uterus didelphys shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

The WP:ONUS is on you as the original proponent of the edit to discuss and obtain consensus for the edit. Stop reverting. Jasper Deng (talk) 21:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested in uncivil transphobic screeds (it is not a scientific fact that only women have a uterus, see intersex for example) that try to absolve you of all wrongdoing. If you care so much about this, open a talk page discussion on the article talk page. If not, leave it. My good faith attempt to follow BRD is the right thing to do and you're doing everything to frustrate it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry that you are not interested. The thing is, though, that you must be. I think you reverted the above just because you wanted to evade those first two points more than anything. I notice that you didn't address them in your response. I notice, too, that you didn't address my point that "women" was the term otherwise used throughout that article, either. By the way, I have checked several other articles about female reproductive organs and female physiology, and they all use "woman" and "women" throughout. If you were sincere about furthering some worthy goal here on WP, I rather think that you would have done a thorougher job. I am also not too sure that you are not violating WP:SOAP — but perhaps that's debatable. You have furthermore done nothing to make me think better of referring the matter of your behaviour to another administrator. Things like calling me "transphobic" and accusing me of "wrongdoing" are quite beyond the pale. Please do not post abusive messages on my Talk page. Kelisi (talk) 05:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Hugh Aynesworth

On 30 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hugh Aynesworth, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 05:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Vijayakanth

On 31 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Vijayakanth, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 04:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Euskirchener Kreisbahnen

Hello, Kelisi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Euskirchener Kreisbahnen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlaskaAirlines1282a.jpg - Legend with scale?

Hi, and thanks for your excellent diagram of the route of Alaska Airlines flight 1282. Is there any chance you could add a legend to show scale? Thanks! Dcs002 (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlaskaAirlines1282a.jpg - Correct location

Hi there. Good job on your diagram of the flight history. However, I noticed that the NTSB said <ref name="NTSB briefing">{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGWLBLb9Pm4 |title=NTSB briefing}}</ref> that information from the flight data recorder indicated a drop in cabin pressure (the plug failed) at 5:12:33 PM. However, the location of the plane at that time <ref name="AS1282 flight data">{{cite web |url=https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/alaska-airlines-737-9-max-exit-door-separates-in-flight/ |title=AS1282 flight data}}</ref> was 45°30'10.4"N 122°49'59.4"W, which is several miles from the location shown on your diagram. TunisianSunsetLight (talk) 19:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Charles Fried

On 30 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Charles Fried, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Papineau (horse)

On 11 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Papineau (horse), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 23:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Jurassic Park (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. The reason for using the template is to establish that there's some basis for the conversion, rather than an editor pulling numbers out of thin air. You were asked to use it and declined to do so, hence this notice. You're welcome to use the Convert template or provide a source for your number. DonIago (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous, DonIago. If you think it's so important to use the template, then by all means, you can insert it, and I see that you still couldn't be bothered — but you could be bothered posting this notice on my Talk page, which must have involved a greater effort. Well, I couldn't be bothered continuing this, to my way of thinking, rather silly disagreement. Have a nice day. Kelisi (talk) 15:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Erling Folkvord

On 9 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Erling Folkvord, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the addition of maps in Penang

Hey there. Regarding the map that you added in Penang, I'll have to disagree. It simply doesn't depict anything more than a blank raw map, there was no additional information from it & up to yesterday, that map along with several other images were causing MOS:SANDWICH. In fact, one could just as easily open up OSM & get the same viewpoint, but with enhanced functionalities (rather than attaching a raw OSM map that just appears repetitive to the location map within the same section).

In fact, there had been previous discussions about the article when nominating it for GA. One sticking point was the excess images in the article. WP isn't a repository, and there should have been greater prudence in adding images, charts or maps into the article so as to ensure relevance and remaining pertinent to the prose (and not adding repetitive maps which add little to what has been already present).

Maybe a wider discussion could be initiated so as to determine the consensus for this OSM map you're adding? hundenvonPG (talk) 09:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. You're not looking closely enough. There is plenty of additional information on it, inserted by me. This is why it annoys me so much that somebody would simply cast it aside after I took the trouble to enhance the base map. It deserves to be there. It's more detailed than any other map there. Kelisi (talk) 16:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Chien Tung-ming

On 17 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chien Tung-ming, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 15:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pat Thomas (Ghanaian musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Coast.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Shahryar Khan

On 29 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Shahryar Khan, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 17:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Richard Serra

On 2 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard Serra, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – robertsky (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Obi Ezeh

On 9 May 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Obi Ezeh, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Birubala Rabha

On 15 May 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Birubala Rabha, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 22:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Narayanan Vaghul

On 23 May 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Narayanan Vaghul, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 15:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ParkerButtonKLS.png

The file File:ParkerButtonKLS.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Image intended for userpage, but no longer in use, no foreseeable educational use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nutshinou ^Talk! 23:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PCMapsButtonKLS.png

The file File:PCMapsButtonKLS.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Image intended for userpage, but no longer in use, no foreseeable educational use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nutshinou ^Talk! 23:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henri Nallet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Croix.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Laurence Gluck

On 20 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Laurence Gluck, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 20:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Sergeant Cecil

On 30 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sergeant Cecil, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 04:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Death Barnstar
		Thank you for your consistent contributions towards improving recent death articles. Regards, --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply to me here, please ping me. 18:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, Classicwiki! Kelisi (talk) 19:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Leo Burke

On 26 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Leo Burke, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 02:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miguel Báez Espuny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish bullfighters

Hello Kelisi, nice to meet you. I just saw that you have created the biography of Pepe Luis Vázquez Silva, and frankly you have created a spectacular article, congratulations! As I see that you have an interest in Spanish bullfighter biographies, an interest that we share, I wanted to ask you if you were already creating the article of Paco Camino or if you were in the process of doing it. I am asking because I am already doing the draft and I would not want to interfere with your work. Regards! _-_Alsor (talk) 11:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! And you'll be happy to know that I am not doing Paco Camino, and since you are doing him, I'll lay off, as it were. I see that Camino died mere days ago. By the way, we customarily call bullfighting a sport, even if aficionados see it otherwise. Is Spanish by any chance your first language? If so, you might consider translating the Pepe Luis Vázquez Silva into Spanish. There is no article about him on es:WP. He must be the only Spanish bullfighter with an article on en:WP but not es:WP. Kelisi (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelisi Well, I'm getting to it! I hope to be in time to nominate the article for Main Page. Well, to be specific, Catalan is my first language, but obviously being a Spanish national it is my second language. Anecdotes aside, I will take the time to create the Pepe Vásquez article in Spanish. I already thought it was strange that he didn't have one.

On the consideration of bullfighting as a sport. At least in Spain the press and the actors of the bullfighting world have never mentioned it as a sport but as a cultural spectacle. In fact, the first article of the Law 18/2013, of 12 November, for the regulation of bullfighting as cultural heritage says that

"bullfighting is understood as the set of knowledge and artistic activities, [...] relevant expression of the traditional culture of the Spanish people [...]. It is understood included in the concept of bullfighting all artistic and cultural manifestation linked to it.

So, at least legally, it would be definable more as an artistic and cultural spectacle than a sport. And I think the same... _-_Alsor (talk) 17:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know that it is not really considered a sport in places where it is practised, but elsewhere... I personally don't think of figure skating as a sport, but rather as something more akin to a performing art. Nonetheless, if I did an article about a figure skater, I would be obliged to describe him/her as a "sports(wo)man" — because that is the common perception in most places. Kelisi (talk) 04:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iván Fandiño, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antena 3.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paquirri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba.

ITN recognition for Matia Chowdhury

On 21 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Matia Chowdhury, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello. I saw this edit summary on my watchlist and it left me perplexed. Why is that "ignorant"? I don't recall whether that was my own writing or someone else's, but that's not really a common sentiment I've come across either way, so I thought I'd ask. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 23:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quite simple: the pre— and post— words can only be used as adjectives, and never as adverbs. Using them as adverbs is as ignorant as saying "It ain't never mattered nohow" or "I done it real good", or something like that — just crappy English, "irregardless" you might (but shouldn't) say. Kelisi (talk) 01:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say I agree, but at least that's more descriptive than your edit summary. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 01:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]