Jump to content

Talk:Wildlife

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alanis Rubi Rosario. Peer reviewers: Khatherinne.rivera, NRC2020UPRC.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

I have completely re-written the Wildlife destruction section. I really couldn't work out how to properly link references (this is my first serious Wiki edit) so please help out with the Diamond ref if you can. Gary Beilby 16:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is terribly written, with many statements relating to point of view. I find the statement "It is ok to use wildlife to human benefit as long as you do not use to much or it could have strong negative impact in the environment." Particularly offensive. That is a viewpoint at odds with many modern environmental philosophers and is disrespectfull to the inherent value of life.

this page is really bad dosent make sense and not informative as there is too little info and very few links related to wildlife and its conservation on this page

  • I have interconnected this "Wildlife" / "Wildlife Conservation" page now to many conservation related pages on Wikipedia, and also added External Links.

All are welcome to please make this page better. Thanks

Atulsnischal 01:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Additional Wildlife Conservation Links"

[edit]

See also

References

Atulsnischal 05:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please create more "Wildlife of ....." articles for all countries.

[edit]

.... and kindly contribute to these new articles when you get time, and request others too.

See Wildlife of India for reference.

Thanks

Atulsnischal 18:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas of India & Conservation

[edit]

If you are interested in Environment, Wildlife, Conservation and Nature etc. please join in to contribute, even starting off with making new stub class articles will be a great contribution.

Sincerely

Atulsnischal 16:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need senior administrators or people who are long in Wikipedia to help us with the templates and for other further helps. Details can be seen in its talk page. IT's urgent. We want this wkiproject to be added to the exsisting WP:IND banner. Amartyabag TALK2ME 05:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This needs a flag or two

[edit]

I agree that this article is poorly executed and needs to be rewritten to meet quality standards and NPOV. I think the last section is particularly weak, and the article may be better off without it until the topic can be approached with an acceptable style. Anyone want to flag for quality, citations, and NPOV? I would, but I have no idea how to do so. --88.149.173.98 18:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use work?

[edit]

I found much of this taken from http://www.idiotvox.com/Photography/PodCast_Review_Chameleons_Eye_Israel_News_Photos_and_Features__17160.html under the heading "Animals and Wildlife Images"

Definition of Wildlife

[edit]

According to Wiktionary, and often in common usage, the term "wildlife" refers only to animals, not plants or other organisms. Is this a "common mistake", or a legitimate alternative meaning? I think this discrepancy should be dealt with in the article. Gidip (talk) 13:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I came to the page to clarify the same. To me, all living things not bred / grown by humans are wildlife, but in common usage including wildlife organisations it means animals, and only "obvious" animals like birds and mammals, rarely insections etc except as prey. Perhaps this is for PR reasons. There is probably no right answer, but the article should then mention the ambiguity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oblomov99 (talk • contribs) 09:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

religion

[edit]

I've removed the very poorly worded and misspelt paragraph in the religion section. It has no relevance to the subject which is, ....Oh yes, WILDLIFE. the remaining paragraph is only barely relevant and probably should be removed. BUT some do gooding reactionary reverted it without even thinking, I give in, no wonder wikipedia is derided for its rubbish content Splodgeness (talk) 08:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plants

[edit]

Why wildlife is only relates to animal when the word wildlifes refers to catch all term for all types of organisms?2404:8000:1027:85F6:A140:91BB:6B11:B462 (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

English

[edit]

Where do we find domestic animals 41.114.175.117 (talk) 19:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sea life

[edit]

Save the Earth 2A00:23EE:2280:331E:3841:965F:C2EE:F99E (talk) 13:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wildlife&oldid=1259756424"