user talk:rogerd
- Archive 1 -- 9 Mar 2005 thru 31 Jul 2005
- Archive 2 -- 1 Aug 2005 thru 22 Dec 2005
- Archive 3 -- 23 Dec 2005 thru 15 Mar 2006
- Archive 4 -- 16 Mar 2006 thru 1 Jun 2006
- Archive 5 -- 2 Jun 2006 thru 6 Oct 2006
- Archive 6 -- 6 Oct 2006 thru 25 Jan 2007
- Archive 7 -- 30 Jan 2007 thru 17 May 2007
- Archive 8 -- 27 May 2007 thru 15 Dec 2007
- Archive 9 -- 23 Dec 2007 thru 31 Dec 2008
- Archive 10 -- 1 Jan 2009 thru 2 Jan 2010
- Archive 11 -- 8 Jan 2010 thru 22 Feb 2014
- Archive 12 -- 11 Mar 2014 thru 16 April 2017
- Archive 13 -- 19 May 2017 thru 25 May 2019
- Archive 14 -- 31 May 2019 thru 3 July 2023
- Archive 15 -- 3 July 2023 thru 25 Oct 2024
- Special Archive - RfA related discussions
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
MfD nomination of User:Rogerd/AmExcept
[edit]
User:Rogerd/AmExcept, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rogerd/AmExcept and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Rogerd/AmExcept during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Cremastra (u — c) 23:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm embarrassed I didn't recognize your username until I saw it with the lowercase "r". Thanks for what you do. BusterD (talk) 00:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Aw shucks. Actually, I haven't been as active as I used to be lately. Thanks again for responding to this silly MfD. rogerd (talk) 00:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Silly MfDs are my specialty, sad to say. BusterD (talk) 01:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- You do good work. rogerd (talk) 03:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Silly MfDs are my specialty, sad to say. BusterD (talk) 01:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Aw shucks. Actually, I haven't been as active as I used to be lately. Thanks again for responding to this silly MfD. rogerd (talk) 00:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have withdrawn the MfD for obvious reasons. Apologies for the disturbance. Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 21:46, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 222, October 2024
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
- Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.
Technical news
- Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068
Arbitration
- RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
- The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
Miscellaneous
- An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
[edit]- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?