Talk:Boomer Esiason

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boomer Esiason article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹ The template below (WikiProject National Football League) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

National Football League: Jets High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Jets task force.

New York (state): Long Island Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Long Island, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Esiason and Young

The article said:

"Arguably the most prolific left-handed quarterback in NFL history (Pro Football Hall of Fame member Steve Young — the first left-handed quarterback to be inducted — actually ranks below him in many statistical categories)"

I edited this. I changed it to "among the most prolfiic" and removed the Steve Young reference because his statisitcs are indeed good. However, this statement has a number of problems.

First of all, there is no need to make a contentious statment that is open to argument about the quality of the two. Second, Steve Young played a full 18 games less than Boomer, making it hard to compare the two side by side.

Third, it is not entirely true. The wording of the statement would lead one to believe that Boomer outranks Young vastly, due to the statement about "many categories."

Boomer has more Completions, Attempts, Yards and TDs, sure (4 categories). He ranks below Young in: carries, rushing yards, rushing TDs, yards per pass attempt, QB rating, completion percentage, every post season category, pro bowls, MVP awards, and Super Bowl appearances and wins. And he threw more interceptions. This is more than 12 categories. 4 is hardly "many" when compared to 12.

So, while it is acceptable to indicate Boomer's quality at his position, as a lefty, and his statistical achievements are nice, stating in this manner is not only misleading but unneccessary.

--L.A.F. 23:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl

Whereas I was bemused by the statement "summarily drubbed by the 49ers) not only is that an emotional POV, it's also grossly incorrect. The Bengal's margin of loss (in XVI & XXIII), being 4.5pt ave, was dramatically less than the others in the 49er's dynastic period (average 30 pt loses).

For that I will remove the statement. But I chuckled a bit inside.

I also updated the fact that Boomer retired as a Bengal. His last play, EVAH, being a 77 yard TD play-action pass to Darnay Scott.

--Duemellon 15:51, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC

Yes, that statement was completely wrong. The Bengals gave the 49ers their best challenge in the SB, both times. The 49ers won in the last minute in SB XXIII. It was a very close game. The Bengals were shut down on offense, with their only touchdown coming from a kickoff return, but their defense was awesome and kept the game close. In the earlier game (in which Boomer was not the QB), the Bengals came from 20 down to make it close. Very respectable. -- Decumanus 16:00, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

German-American

Anyone have a good source for this? Michael 03:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esiason claimed that he was mostly of Norwegian descent during his radio show on September 20, 2007. --GodfreyDaniels 21:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of "personal conflct"?

"He was a color commentator for ABC's Monday Night Football from 1998 to 2000. Following his dismissal by ABC (due primarily to personal conflicts between him and play-by-play announcer Al Michaels)"

Can someone please research a bit further into this? Not a single Wiki page that brings up that the two had personal issues between each other goes into any more detail than this as to what exactly they couldn't get along about. Was it just general douchebaggery with one of the two that the other couldn't stand? Was it some opinion that one person held that the other couldn't wrap their head around that they also found to be an uncalled for opinion to hold? Was it something Al said about Boomer during his football career that made Boomer not even want to be alongside him to begin with? What was the big deal here, because it had led to ABC firing Boomer because of it. Someone needs to find some sort of creditable reference to just what happened. Quotes would be nice. Just SOMETHING other than "oh, they couldn't get along, so we fired someone and kept the other", because it makes little sense for someone to just randomly hate someone else without any rhyme or reason. Darkpower (talk) 21:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Boomer Esiason. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Boomer Esiason. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121030200111/http://www.footballnation.com/content/top-100-qbs-since-the-merger-40-21/15546/ to http://www.footballnation.com/content/top-100-qbs-since-the-merger-40-21/15546/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120114165149/http://cincinnati.com/terror/esiason21.html to http://cincinnati.com/terror/esiason21.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wfan.com/pages/1270233.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop swaying the plays on the field

You guys saying what you think phucks up the game.Ater the play don't say what you think. 2603:7080:5F00:13F:7DCA:643E:6595:9051 (talk) 20:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]